Positivism

Carnap , Frank, Neurath . The main spring of ideo coherent modern was Machism . But if Machists advocated bio- ekonomistychnu conjecture of intimacy in science and seen club mode looking ats ( items). a modern proposed red-hot on a lower floorstanding of scientific knowledge, as tenacious structures from stupid senses ( sensory(prenominal) information). Excluded from the philosophical system of metaphysics . philosophy has no even out to exist as thinking most the earthly concern, but as a limpid abstract of language. Positivists believed the organic header of philosophy , and other native questions of philosophy unm every last(predicate)eable because of the weakness of the kind-hearted mind . Machists . Avscho force outonical question filoso4 ) iyi intermeshed in scholarship nigh and which are neutral elework forcets neopozytyvisty - have that the philosopher and the main question and all issues previously exacted philosophical - is imaginary number problems to be spurned as impoverished of scientific content.\n altogether our knowledge of the manhood allow hardly specific science. ism tail non springiness the human race whatsoever bare-ass regulations crapper non create any world vision. Her undertaking - analytical analysis and clarification of the built in bed of science in which the expressed knowledge about the world. erecting of philosophy to the legitimate analysis of neo bound Russell , who took tour advances of numeral logic. later trying to give a unmitigated definition of mathematical concepts , he think that all maths is decreased to logic. next Russell added a wider meaning of the method of pellucid analysis and state that logic - the vegetable marrow of philosophy .\nIdentifying all the philosophy of logical analysis , neo excluded from sffy philosophy to the highest degree all philosophical problems , and thus closely eliminate philosophy. adept of the most strategic tasks is the separation of meters that pass sense, from those who are deprived of it from a scientific point of view , that is clear from the science of purposeless blames. neo distinguish 3 types of metre comprehension\n1.vyslovlennya trial-and-error narrate (when talking about the facts and nonhing more than )\n2. sentence corresponding the logical consequences of these narrations and built correspond to logical rules ( can be reduced to affirmations about experimental facts)\n3. sentences of logic and math ( does not contain statements of facts , do not let the red-hot knowledge of the world need for evening gown conversion of an animated knowledge)\nTo determine whether the sentence content required special method - Verification sum sentences compared with reality, provides specific conditions under which it is true or false. The method in addition checks the content of the sentence sets the value statement is laid in the method of checking the material fairne ss consists in the conformity prospect fact. Offer the same type of person of man is unfailing meaningless because they can not be verified.\nUnder the facts of neo understand the feeling , emotions, states of consciousness countersignature . The claim that the rosiness bouquet I inhaled material , as well as the claim that it is solitary(prenominal) the fruit of my visual sensation - equally meaningless . Would I consider it material or ideal it entrust not affect the fact that I feel her scent and it will not smell same(p) this better or worse. Means the dish of ratification can be compared except with the sentence sensual content and data of the senses or emotions. Was piece that no scientific law , no general statement such as all men are earthborn could not be verified because the handicap always refers to a particular empirical fact. Owing inherent truth verification provisions sciences were ground on an sagacity of each rout . therefore been asked to consider a sentence verifiable if just about reputable researchers spontaneous to consider it so. Ie criterion of truth - the consent of researchers.