Feminism in Jane Eyre

Jane Eyre was written in a quantify where the Bildungsroman was a common form of literature. The importance was that the mid-nineteenth trip out speed was, the age in which women were, for the jump time, ranked equally with men as preservers within a major genre (Sussman 1). In many of these novels, the themes were the equal the protagonist dealt with the same issues, search for autonomy and selfhood in opposition to the mixer constraints placed upon the fe potent, including the demand for marriage (Sussman).Jane Eyre fits this mould perfectly. Throughout the novel, the reader follows Jane Eyre on a voyage of development from adolescence to maturity to head that a thirst for emancipation and change motivates quite a little to search for their receive individualism. Jane begins to form her identity with the embolden of many fictitious characters she encounters at Lowood, Thornfield, and Marsh End. knock off Maria tabernacle, who was Janes first signifi jakest female e ncounter at Lowood, functions as a spot model and an captivate for Jane. fille tabernacles character displays the breakdown of the Great filament of Being, however in a more(prenominal) than gentle right smart than Rochester or Jane herself. She defies Mr. Brocklehurst and his hypocritical ways only as far as she go out still retain shelter and her place as a teacher. To Jane, drop off synagogue embodies all of the qualities that a woman should. Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar write, Miss Temple, for instance, with her marble pallor, is a shrine of ladylike virtues magnanimity, cultivation, courtesy and repression (Gilbert 344).While Miss Temple seems to show Jane what she should become, she also introduces her to control over her emotions. Unlike Jane, whose self-assertiveness permits her to ease off in to passionate confrontations, Miss Temple would never allow any(prenominal)thing to say through and through her, no wings leave alone rush in her head, no fantasies of fiery heath disturb her equanimity, but she will feel merciful anger (Gilbert 345). Her warp in Janes adolescence and early adulthood teach her to discombobulate harmonious thoughts, and to give allegiance to duty and order (Gilbert 347).Here, Miss Temple teaches Jane to suppress her wild emotions and become compliant under the superior male, but still maintain an inward anger that can never be expressed. Jane, however, cannot conform to the lesson being taught to her through Miss Temple, she learns that her trip into maturity and freedom requires her to be more independent and passionate than Miss Temple instructs. Miss Temple is not only like a mother solve to Jane, but she is also encouraging of intellectual branch ( cryptic 466).Temples impact on Janes education allows her to become unfalteringer in character, which will even offtually bring her to free emancipation. Kathleen Tillotson fuck offs in Miss Temple a sign of hope for Jane the prompt fire and the cake f rom the cupboard in Miss Temples room be assertions of individual loving-kindness, though also of its limited power (Tillotson 60) In go against of this, Tillotson writes that Jane at Thornfield is submitting to virtue in lovable form, as she had once submitted to Miss Temple (Tillotson 60).In other words, Tillotson argues that although Miss Temple may throw off imperatively influenced Jane in veritable ways, ultimately her call for repression and submission instigates Janes credit that she must discover her own place in life, and no integrity can rate it for her. While Jane attends Lowood, she encounters another character that will do her to shape her identity. When Helen Burns is introduced to the novel, she brings with her a kind of warmth and sacred light that touches Jane and Helen aids her in developing into the woman that she will soon become.She has a devout faith in Christ, and using this, Helen is able to function as Janes main guide in building a operose charac ter who is filled with forgiveness, hope and a strong comprehend of self. Helen allows Jane to peer into a world where the values of endurance and obedience (Singleton, 70) are visible. Jane often relies on Helen because she is strong of will, awkward and blundering in the practical world yet intellectually and spiritually mature beyond her years . . . ithout pettiness, hysteria, or self-repudiation (Rich 466).These qualities will champion Helen in leading Jane down a path that will indefinitely make her shine amongst those who surround her. A sympathetic Helen Burns is seen lavishing emotions upon Jane that she has never felt before, let alone imagined. Helen assists Jane by being a instruct and a friend, a companion that Jane can confide in. Helen and Miss Temple together represent two key facets of the feminist community the requisite for companionship and mentors.These necessities are what the Reeds denied Jane (Singleton 66). By showing Jane love and encouragement she teach es Jane that elementary importance is taming her rage and learning to forgive . . . that this is the model that Christ has nail down forth in the New Testament to love ones enemies (Singleton 73). As Helen encourages Jane to arrive at to be her best, she acts a righteous and ethical ramp (Rich 467), she provides Jane with a sense of her own worth and of ethical choice (Rich 467).Bronte introduces Helen Buns into the novel to aid Jane and to be a guiding light in the ethical and moral world by showing Helen to be a character who is strong and true to herself, even until the end of her life by using Helen as an example, when Jane leaves Lowood, she finds herself and she is ready to face to world with her head held high, face shining in the light. Another representation of religion, and also a strong male influence in Janes life is that of St. rear Rivers. The character of St. backside is one of the terminal obstacles to Janes maturation and understanding of her role as an ind ependent and free woman.St. John represents, like the character of Brocklehurst before him, the hypocrisy and unwavering patriarchy of make religion and its many hypocritical keepers, but unlike Brocklehurst, St. Johns piety is more real and his misogyny somewhat more subtle, and, following his proposal, Jane comes to a make better understanding of who she is and where her life is headed. St. John asks for Janes hand in marriage, but not out of love rather, he intends Jane to be a missionary married woman, psyche who will be of use to him in the function of God.According to Adrienne Rich, on that point is a certain virtue in this kind of offer, especially for Jane What St. John offers Jane is perhaps the deepest lure for a spiritual woman, that of adopting a mans cause or career and making it her own (Rich 473). In this proposed marriage, there is the attraction of some of the things she has been searching for, namely a life of service and tenet, and a way of overcoming the ob stacles of patriarchy she has struggled with her entire life, by adopting a life in service to male cause.Therein lies a part of the problem, however, as service and principle are only part of what she desires in life, and, as she ultimately discovers, even beyond the attraction of taking on a more male role, that this will not fulfill her need for a life that is more complete. In the rise by Gilbert and Gubar, they explain, In fact, as St. Johns wife she will be entering into a union even more unequal than that proposed by Rochester, a marriage reflecting, once again, her absolute ejection from the life of wholeness toward which her pilgrimage has been directed (Gilbert 366). With St.Johns proposal of marriage, Jane begins to comprehend more about herself and where her life is headed. She discovers that she cannot devote her energy and ambition towards fulfilling upright a part of her life, such as the desire for service, but rather, she discovers that her life inescapably to be a life of wholeness, something that a marriage to St. John could never provide, because St. John, like Brocklehurst, is a pillar of patriarchy (Gilbert 366), a misogynist who is bent, consciously or unconsciously, on restraining Jane spiritually and emotionally.Rich points out in her essay that St.Johns offer of marriage is a means in which he will use her (Rich 473), and fortunately, Jane sees through the superficial benefits of a union with the patriarchal St. John, and that her for her to be content, she needs a life of wholeness. Armed with these realizations, Jane is now able to give-up the ghost to her true love, Rochester, on her own terms. The character of Mr. Edward Rochester influences the spiritual and personal growth of Jane through his relationship with her as the master at Thornfield and later, as her husband. His self-proclamation as being equal to Jane shows the breakdown of the Great Chain of Being.Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar write that while in one sense Jan e and Rochester begin their relationship as master and servant, prince and Cinderella, Mr. B and Pamela, in another they begin as spiritual equals (Gilbert 352). In his allowance of Jane to be his equal, he encourages her progression to a strong sense of her own identity and independence. In a more versed light, Rochester is the one who will eventually awaken Jane to her own sexuality. This occasion exhibits Janes journey into adult maturation it is he who will initiate her into the mysteries of the flesh (Gilbert 355).Adrienne Rich states that the episodes at Thornfield encompass three defining aspects the house, Rochester, and Bertha. Rich writes, Jane comes to womanhood and to certain definitive choices about what it means to be a woman (Rich 468). In other words, during her stay at Thornfield and due to her interactions with its inhabitants, namely Rochester, Jane realizes what being a woman suggests. The break down of the Great Chain of Being is shown through Rochester even fu rther, when Jane finds that he is married to another woman.As she leaves him because of her strength and of her own free will, Janes independence is reinforced. Critic Elaine Baruch contrasts this action to Romanticism, and states, Unlike the lady of the mediaeval romance who had merely to sit still in order to find a destiny in the form of some passing knight, late woman must seek her own hero (Baruch 157). Here, Baruch is commenting on how Rochesters spicy and haunting past results in a positive outcome for Jane, in that it strengthens her independence and desire for freedom and identity.Instead of deliberately wasting time waiting for destiny to find her, Jane seeks out the right destiny for herself. The dissimilar characters in Charlotte Brontes Jane Eyre provide the heroine with both role models and obstacles to her maturation into adulthood, and more importantly, womanhood. Janes experiences with these characters, and what she takes from each, show the importance of determ ining for oneself his or her own morals, ethics, goals, and by not allowing others to dictate how one lives his or her life, love, wealth, and ultimately happiness can be achieved. every(prenominal) passel confine their own unique set of traits, from their morality to their otherworldliness, their speech, and their faults. To be a person who is happy and truly fortunate on spiritual, emotional, and bodily levels, one must draw from the good and decent people he or she meets that which will be ultimately beneficent for example, emulating and learning from the spirituality of a person who is truly and passionately spiritual.Unfortunately, not all the people a person meets in his or her life will pull in qualities which a person will want to emulate in a way, these people become obstacles to a persons pilgrimage towards self-understanding and happiness. These people, the barriers to a persons self-development, are just as important as the people who function as positive role model s. Those who are consciously or unconsciously determined to take leave those on the path to happiness and self-discovery can be destructive, but they can also be unintentionally helpful.All too often, these figures are successful in breaking other another persons will and forcing their principles upon him, but when people like this, the hypocrites, the self-righteous, the misogynists, the arrogant aristocrats, and the like, fail, that previously oppressed person becomes significantly stronger by overcoming these barriers. Ultimately, nearly everyone has a life-long struggle with self-identity, and nearly everyone has encountered these influential people in his life, the role models and the obstacles.Unfortunately many become victims to the authority of those people who would force their will upon others, and ultimately, most people never complete their journey to independence all too often they give up, and allow themselves to bent to the will of others. It is evident that this pil grimage is a long and arduous one, a journey that few complete, and the author suggests that on top of the inherent rockyy of this journey, women have an even greater challenge before them.Because of the insidious and ubiquitous influence of patriarchy in the authors society, the journey towards independence and self-understanding becomes significantly more difficult for women it is a truly joyous occasion when a woman does keep abreast in breaking free from the chains of male dominated society, seemly independent, self-aware, and, hopefully, happy.