Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Answering Questions about Pioneers of Psychology Term Paper
Answering Questions about Pioneers of Psychology - Term Paper ExampleMoore (2006) argues that falling of an apple find by Newton leads to growth of common m other(a) wit psychological science which in turn guides us to human psychology. It posterior be said that observation of free falling apple and formulation of laws of gravity is a reflectance of common sense of a great person like Newton. In addition to common sense psychology, Newton has as well as done an important work regarding color vision which has a great logical implication in biological psychology and physiology. Freedheim (2003) discusses in his work that Newton was the only physicist who recognized the nature of color. sooner and during the time of Newton, there was a great debate that whether light is wave or particle in nature. But Newton supported particle theory about the nature of light. This theory left fatheaded impact on early development of psychology. One can recount that Newton based his scientific t heories on practical experience of phenomenon. It is known as an empirical approach. This approach was also adopted in psychology and philosophy due to its fruitful results. Kumar (2002) writing about Newtons approach says that roll profoundly admired him and sought to develop such an approach in philosophy which was similar to it. afterward on this approach helped psychologists to study human behavior. There is close relation among subjects of social as closely as natural sciences. Describing this relationship Bornstein (1984, p. 242) writes physical science begets bio-chemistry, bio-chemistry begets physiology and physiology begets psychology. So one can say that physics has great closeness with psychology and laws of motion and gravitation gravel influenced the subject matter of psychology. Present scholars say that if a child asks about falling of apples or any other similar thing indeed one can answer him with profound understanding of laws of nature. 2. Errors in Aristot les Psychology Aristotle occupies a profound place in different fields, such as literature, philosophy, history and psychology. As he has contributed in other fields, similarly his prominent work in psychology has attracted the attention of great scholars and psychologists. Many researchers have critically examined and studied Aristotles thoughts about the mind of human beings. He has discussed about the soulfulness, human imagination, perception, thinking and desire. Aristotle psychology has prominent role in study of soul which is called psuche in Greek language. Aristotle distinguishes between living and non-living things on basis of existence of soul. Aristotle argues that all living things have soul while no-living things do not have this essential element. He further says that due to this important element people grow, digest, breathe and reproduce. He also believes that plants and animals have souls as human beings. Aristotle has further categorized the organisms on basis o f their capabilities. In Aristotles descry plants and animals possess lesser powers of soul while human souls have more powers. Moreover, Aristotle argues that soul cannot live away(p) the body. Guthrie (1956) explaining this concept of soul says that in Aristotles view body is a tool through which soul expresses itself. On the other hand, Aristotle talking about thought maintains that it can exist outside the body of a person. When one analyzes psychological works of Aristotle, then many errors become evident. One major criticism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment